“To Be, or Not to Be”: Critical Assessment of the Use of α-Acoustic Diversity Indices to Evaluate the Richness and Abundance of Coastal Marine Fish Sounds
1 Laboratory of Functional and Evolutionary Morphology, FOCUS, University of Liege, Liege 4000, Belgium; (M.B.); (E.P.)
2 Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, CNRS, CEFREM UMR 5110, 66860 Perpignan, France;
3 Chorus Institute, 5 Rue Gallice, 38100 Grenoble, France
4 PSL University, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, 98729 Moorea, French Polynesia;
5 Laboratoire d'Excellence “CORAIL”, 66860 Perpignan, France
* Corresponding author:
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 Nov 2022 / Revised: 22 Dec 2022 / Accepted: 10 Jan 2023 / Published: 7 Apr 2023
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring can be used to assess the presence of vocal species. Automatic estimation of such information is critical for allowing diversity monitoring over long time spans. Among the existing tools, α-acoustic indices were originally designed to assess the richness/complexity of terrestrial soundscapes. However, their use in marine environments is impacted by fundamental differences between terrestrial and marine soundscapes. The aim of this study was to determine how they vary depending on the abundance and sound type richness of fish sounds. Fourteen indices used in terrestrial environments were tested. The indices were calculated for files from three sources: a controlled environment (playback of artificial tracks in a pool), in situ playbacks (playback of natural soundscapes), and a natural environment (only natural sounds). The controlled experiment showed that some indices were correlated with the sound abundance but not with the sound type richness, implying that they are not capable of distinguishing the different types of fish sounds. In the in situ playbacks, the indices were not able to capture differences, both in terms of the sound abundance and sound type diversity. In the natural environment, there was no correlation between most of the indices and the abundance of sounds. They were impacted by mass phenomena of biological sounds (e.g., the Pomacentridae sounds in shallow reefs) that cannot inform on fish acoustic diversity. Indices are appropriate when soundscapes are divided into bands. In contrast to terrestrial environments, frequency bands in coastal marine soundscapes do not provide ecologically relevant information on diversity. Overall, indices do not appear to be suitable for inferring marine fish sound diversity.
Keywords: passive acoustic monitoring; French Polynesia; acoustic entropy; acoustic evenness; sound type richness; acoustic complexity; bioacoustics; ecoacoustics; fish sounds; biodiversity; remote sensing
OPEN ACCESS
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
CITE
Raick, X.; Di Iorio, L.; Lecchini, D.; Bolgan, M.; Parmentier, E. “To Be, or Not to Be”: Critical Assessment of the Use of α-Acoustic Diversity Indices to Evaluate the Richness and Abundance of Coastal Marine Fish Sounds. JEA 2023, 7, 1.
Raick X, Di Iorio L, Lecchini D, Bolgan M, Parmentier E. “To Be, or Not to Be”: Critical Assessment of the Use of α-Acoustic Diversity Indices to Evaluate the Richness and Abundance of Coastal Marine Fish Sounds. Journal of Ecoacoustics. 2023; 7(1):1.
Raick, Xavier; Di Iorio, Lucia; Lecchini, David; Bolgan, Marta; Parmentier, Eric. 2023. "“To Be, or Not to Be”: Critical Assessment of the Use of α-Acoustic Diversity Indices to Evaluate the Richness and Abundance of Coastal Marine Fish Sounds." JEA 7, no. 1: 1.
Not implemented
SHARE
